694 (1984); Kirksey v. State, 112 Nev. 980, 987, 923 P.2d 1102, 1107
(1996). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by
finding that an evidentiary hearing was unwarranted, see NRS 34.770(2);
Nika v. State, 124 Nev. 1272, 1300-01, 198 P.3d 839, 858 (2008) (holding
that a petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing only when specific
factual allegations are asserted "that are not belied or repelled by the
record and that, if true, would entitle him to relief'), and did not err by
rejecting Adams's ineffective-assistance claims. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED, 1
Saitta
1 1n his fast track statement, Adams inappropriately incorporates
and relies upon documents submitted to the district court for his argument
on the merits of the appeal. NRAP 28(e)(2). Additionally, the fast track
statement does not comply with NRAP 32(a)(4) because it does not have 1-
inch margins on all four sides. Counsel for Adams is cautioned that
failure to comply with the briefing requirements in the future may result
in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A le
cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge
Carmine J. Colucci & Associates
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A e