Thomas v. Lucherini

(2000) (noting that a final order or judgment must "dispose[ ] of all the issues presented in the case, and leave[ ] nothing for the future consideration of the court, except for post-judgment issues such as attorney's fees and costs"). With regard to the district court's decision to vacate the hearing on appellant's motion for NRCP 60(b) relief from the statistical closure order, because no final judgment has been entered and no statute or other court rule provides for an appeal from such a determination, see NRAP 3A(b) (setting forth orders and determinations for which an appeal may be taken), we likewise lack jurisdiction to consider appellant's appeal from this decision. Accordingly, because we lack jurisdiction over this matter, we necessarily dismiss this appeal. Once the district court enters a final, appealable judgment, however, appellant, if aggrieved, may appeal from that decision. It is so ORDERED. tes...a.tk , J. Hardesty ° 114. 94 114 . J. Douglas Chsut ' J. Cherry cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge Deshawn Lamont Thomas Robert G. Lucherini, Chtd. Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A e