(2000) (noting that a final order or judgment must "dispose[ ] of all the
issues presented in the case, and leave[ ] nothing for the future
consideration of the court, except for post-judgment issues such as
attorney's fees and costs").
With regard to the district court's decision to vacate the
hearing on appellant's motion for NRCP 60(b) relief from the statistical
closure order, because no final judgment has been entered and no statute
or other court rule provides for an appeal from such a determination, see
NRAP 3A(b) (setting forth orders and determinations for which an appeal
may be taken), we likewise lack jurisdiction to consider appellant's appeal
from this decision. Accordingly, because we lack jurisdiction over this
matter, we necessarily dismiss this appeal. Once the district court enters
a final, appealable judgment, however, appellant, if aggrieved, may appeal
from that decision.
It is so ORDERED.
tes...a.tk , J.
Hardesty
° 114. 94
114 . J.
Douglas
Chsut ' J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge
Deshawn Lamont Thomas
Robert G. Lucherini, Chtd.
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A e