of a reported domestic disturbance, acted unusually nervous, continually
reached his hands into his pockets despite admonitions not to do so, and
had mannerisms consistent with those of a person under the influence Of
drugs. See NRS 171.123; Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.,
Humboldt Cnty., 542 U.S. 177, 185 (2004) ("[A] law enforcement officer's
reasonable suspicion that a person may be involved in criminal activity
permits the officer to stop the person for a brief time and take additional
steps to investigate further."). The district court found credible the
arresting officer's testimony that Davidson consented to a search and
concluded that the consent was voluntary given the totality of the
circumstances. See McMorran v. State, 118 Nev. 379, 383, 46 P.3d 81, 84
(2002); McIntosh v. State, 86 Nev. 133, 136, 466 P.2d 656, 658 (1970).
Because the record supports these determinations, we conclude that the
district court did not err by denying Davidson's motion, and we
ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
J.
Hardesty
V
Douglas Cherry
cc: Hon. Alvin R. Kacin, District Judge
David D. Loreman
Attorney General/Carson City
Elko County District Attorney
Elko County Clerk
SUPREME COUFtT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1.947A