jurisdiction. NRS 34.320. Either writ is an extraordinary remedy, and
whether such a writ will be considered is within this court's sole
discretion. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679,
818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Moreover, it is petitioner's burden to
demonstrate that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v.
Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).
Having considered petitioner's arguments in light of this
court's resolution of the consolidated appeals in Docket Nos. 58530 and
59162, we are not persuaded that our intervention is warranted. Smith,
107 Nev. at 677, 679, 818 P.2d at 851, 853; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d
at 844. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.'
, C.J.
, J.
rut-, j
Saitta
cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge
Marquis Aurbach Coffing
Kemp, Jones & Coulthard, LLP
John Peter Lee Ltd.
Eighth District Court Clerk
'In light of our resolution of this writ petition, petitioner's
emergency stay motion is denied as moot.
SUPREME COURT
OF 2
NEVADA
(0) 1947A