State v. Justin David Campau

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 41612 STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 665 ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: August 13, 2014 ) v. ) Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk ) JUSTIN DAVID CAMPAU, ) THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED ) OPINION AND SHALL NOT Defendant-Appellant. ) BE CITED AS AUTHORITY ) Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail, District Judge. Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, for felony domestic violence, affirmed. Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Shawn F. Wilkerson, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jessica M. Lorello, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. ________________________________________________ Before LANSING, Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge PER CURIAM Justin David Campau pled guilty to felony domestic violence. I.C. §§ 18-903(a), 18- 918(2). In exchange for his guilty plea, an additional charge was dismissed and the state agreed not to pursue an allegation that Campau was a persistent violator. The district court sentenced Campau to a unified term of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years. Campau appeals. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion. Therefore, Campau’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed. 2