FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 18 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-30342
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:04-cr-00122-WFN
v.
MEMORANDUM*
STANLEY JOSEPH SQUETIMKIN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Washington
Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 13, 2014**
Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Stanley Joseph Squetimkin appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 20-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Squetimkin contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
indicate which of the six alleged violations it found him to have committed and
why it did not impose a lesser sentence. He argues that these failures caused the
sentencing explanation to be so inadequate as to impede appellate review. Because
Squetimkin did not raise this objection in the district court, we review for plain
error. See United States v. Hammons, 558 F.3d 1100, 1103 (9th Cir. 2009). We
find none. The record reflects that the district court found that Squetimkin
committed all six alleged violations and provided a reasoned explanation for the
sentence that was sufficient to permit meaningful appellate review. See United
States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).
Squetimkin also contends that the district court imposed a substantively
unreasonable sentence. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing
Squetimkin’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The
sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing
factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Squetimkin’s history on
supervision and the need to protect the public. See id.
AFFIRMED.
2 13-30342