United States v. Juan Romero-Cervantes

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 18 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-10638 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00087-KJM v. MEMORANDUM* JUAN GUSTAVO ROMERO- CERVANTES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding Submitted August 13, 2014** Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Juan Gustavo Romero-Cervantes appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 63-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Romero-Cervantes contends that the district court abused its discretion by failing to depart or vary downward from the advisory Guidelines range on the basis of his cultural assimilation. Our review of this claim is limited to determining whether the court imposed a substantively reasonable sentence. See United States v. Vasquez-Cruz, 692 F.3d 1001, 1008 (9th Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 76 (2013). The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Romero- Cervantes’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The sentence at the top of the Guidelines range is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Romero-Cervantes’s extensive criminal history and five prior deportations. See U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 cmt. n.8; Gall, 552 U.S. at 51. AFFIRMED. 2 13-10638