TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00259-CV
M. S., Appellant
v.
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. D-1-FM-12-006947, HONORABLE SCOTT H. JENKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
After a non-jury trial that appellant M.S. did not attend, the trial court terminated
appellant’s parental rights to a child. Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding
that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) by presenting a professional evaluation of the record
and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. See 386 U.S.
at 744; see also Taylor v. Texas Dep’t of Prot. & Regulatory Servs., 160 S.W.3d 641, 646-47
(Tex. App.—Austin 2005, pet. denied) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of
parental rights). Counsel certified to this Court that she provided appellant with a copy of the Anders
brief and notice of her right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. Appellant did not
file a pro se brief.
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous
and without merit. Finding nothing in the record that might arguably support an appeal, we grant
counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the order of termination.
Jeff Rose, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin
Affirmed
Filed: August 21, 2014
2