Driggers v. Dist. Ct. (Ramparts, Inc.)

Writ relief is generally available only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Moreover, this court has held that the right to appeal is typically an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.' J. J. J. cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge De Castroverde Law Group Sterling Law, LLC Kravitz, Schnitzer & Johnson, Chtd. Eighth District Court Clerk "In light of this order, we deny as moot petitioner's emergency motion for a stay. SUPREME COURT OF 2 NEVADA (0) 1947A