appealable. See NRAP 3A(b); Taylor Constr. Co., 100 Nev. at 209, 678
P.2d at 1153. Appellant seemingly seeks to challenge various post-divorce
decree rulings and orders in Eighth Judicial District Court Case No. D-12-
468773-D that modified her child custody and visitation rights. While an
order that finally establishes child custody is appealable, NRAP 3A(b)(7),
a temporary child custody or visitation order is not. See In re Temp.
Custody of Five Minor Children, 105 Nev. 441, 443, 777 P.2d 901, 902
(1989) (stating that no appeal may be taken from a temporary custody
order subject to periodic review). Our review of the documents before us
reveals that, in the case below, the district court has not yet entered a
final order resolving the parties' various motions to modify child custody
and visitation, and a hearing for that purpose is scheduled to occur on
October 28, 2014. As a result, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal pending
in Docket No. 66063, and we therefore order that appeal dismissed.
It is so ORDERED.'
SS\
Hardesty
, J. J.
Douglas1
—4?-4 VA-
'Although we dismiss the appeal in Docket No. 65702, we defer
ruling on appellant's August 5, 2014, request that the filing fee she paid
on August 4, 2014, be returned. We deny as moot all requests for relief in
Docket No. 66063.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A e
cc: Hon. Cynthia Dianne Steel, District Judge, Family Court Division
Lavonne Kolender
Dale E. Haley
Louis C. Schneider, LLC
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
KO) I947A