court's discretion. Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Petitioner
bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted.
Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844
(2004). Generally, an appeal is an adequate legal remedy precluding writ
relief. Id. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841.
Having considered the writ petition and appendix, we
conclude that our intervention by way of extraordinary writ relief is not
warranted, as petitioner has an adequate legal remedy in the form of an
appeal from any final judgment entered in the district court action. Id.
Accordingly, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith, 107 Nev. at
677, 818 P.2d at 851.
It is so ORDERED.
XR-041n , J.
Hardesty
Douglas
lif7/ #9
de ,J.
r)\,z(t YtA-v
Cherry
cc: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge
Law Offices of Douglas R. Johnson
Naomi R. Arin
Marquis Aurbach Coffing
Law Office of S. Don Bennion
Eighth bistrict Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF 2
NEVADA
(0) I947A