Peck v. State

order, appellant filed a motion for reconsideration of that decision, which tolls the time for filing a notice of appeal. See AA Primo Builders, LLC v. Washington, 126 Nev. „ 245 P.3d 1190, 1192-93 (2010) (recognizing that a timely post-judgment motion for reconsideration that seeks a substantive change to the judgment tolls the time to file a notice of appeal). To date, this motion has not been resolved by the district court, and thus, the notice of appeal is premature as it did not confer jurisdiction upon this court. See NRAP 4(a)(6). For the reasons set forth above, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this matter and dismiss this appeal. In light of this conclusion, we deny as moot appellant's August 18, 2014, motion for leave to file an opening brief. The clerk of this court shall therefore return, unfiled, the proposed opening brief attached to appellant's motion. It is so ORDERED. / n freriAi Hardesty ? 7% "1 , J. Chut. J. Douglas Cherry cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge Frank Milford Peck Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney/Civil Division Washoe District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) I947A ca(04