UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1111
KATHLEEN KICINSKI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA A & T STATE UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00351-CCE-LPA)
Submitted: August 29, 2014 Decided: September 5, 2014
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nancy Pulliam Quinn, THE QUINN LAW FIRM, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Roy Cooper, North Carolina Attorney
General, Gary R. Govert, Assistant Solicitor General, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kathleen Kicinski, a former employee of Defendant
North Carolina A & T University (“University”), appeals the
district court’s order granting the University’s Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings in her employment
discrimination action. We have reviewed the district court’s
ruling de novo, see Butler v. United States, 702 F.3d 749, 751-
52 (4th Cir. 2012) (setting forth standard of review), cert.
denied, 133 S. Ct. 2398 (2013), in conjunction with the relevant
record and the parties’ briefs, and discern no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Kicinski
v. N.C. A & T State Univ., No. 1:11-cv-00351-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C.
Jan. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2