Kathleen Kicinski v. North Carolina A & T State

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1111 KATHLEEN KICINSKI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA A & T STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00351-CCE-LPA) Submitted: August 29, 2014 Decided: September 5, 2014 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nancy Pulliam Quinn, THE QUINN LAW FIRM, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Roy Cooper, North Carolina Attorney General, Gary R. Govert, Assistant Solicitor General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kathleen Kicinski, a former employee of Defendant North Carolina A & T University (“University”), appeals the district court’s order granting the University’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the district court’s ruling de novo, see Butler v. United States, 702 F.3d 749, 751- 52 (4th Cir. 2012) (setting forth standard of review), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 2398 (2013), in conjunction with the relevant record and the parties’ briefs, and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Kicinski v. N.C. A & T State Univ., No. 1:11-cv-00351-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2