TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-12-00669-CR
State of Texas, Appellant
v.
Marcus Tyler Scheffield, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. CR2011-575, HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
In this interlocutory appeal, the State challenges the trial court’s pretrial order
granting appellee Marcus Tyler Scheffield’s motion to suppress statements that he made to a
detective during the investigation. Scheffield’s brief was due on March 11, 2013. On April 4, 2013,
this Court sent Scheffield’s court-appointed counsel, Manuel C. Rodriguez, notice that appellee’s
brief was overdue and that if he failed to file a brief by April 15, 2013, we would consider this
appeal on the State’s brief alone. We have not received a brief from Mr. Rodriguez.
Scheffield is entitled to effective representation at all critical stages of criminal
proceedings, including this interlocutory appeal. See generally Gilley v. State, 418 S.W.3d 114, 120
(Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (discussing constitutional right to counsel that “extends to all critical stages
of the criminal proceeding, not just the actual trial”) (internal quotations omitted). Therefore, we
abate this appeal and remand this cause to the trial court to hold a hearing to determine whether
Scheffield desires to respond to the State’s interlocutory appeal and, if so, whether he is entitled to
have substitute counsel appointed who will effectively represent Scheffield in this interlocutory
appeal.1 Following the hearing, the trial court shall order the appropriate supplemental reporter’s
and clerk’s records, including any order and findings, to be prepared and forwarded to this Court no
later than September 30, 2014.
It is ordered September 9, 2014.
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Goodwin and Field
Abated and Remanded
Filed: September, 9, 2014
1
Because we abate this appeal to allow the trial court to determine if Scheffield is entitled
to have substitute counsel appointed, our order staying the trial court’s proceedings is hereby lifted,
pending reinstatement of this appeal in this Court.
2