Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-14-00508-CV
Rudy MENDEZ,
Appellant
v.
City of San Antonio Building
CITY OF SAN ANTONIO BUILDING STANDARDS BOARD,
Appellee
From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2014-CI-08659
Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 10, 2014
DISMISSED
A filing fee of $195.00 was due from appellant Rudy Mendez when this appeal was filed
but was not paid. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.941(a) (West 2013); id. §§ 51.0051,
51.207(b)(1), 51.208 (West 2013); TEXAS SUPREME COURT ORDER REGARDING FEES CHARGED IN
CIVIL CASES IN THE SUPREME COURT, IN CIVIL CASES IN THE COURTS OF APPEALS, AND BEFORE
THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION (Misc. Docket No. 13-9127, Aug. 16, 2013).
The clerk of the court notified appellant of this deficiency in a letter dated July 22, 2014. The fee
remains unpaid. Rule 5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:
04-14-00508-CV
A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay —
at the time an item is presented for filing — whatever fees are required by statute
or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order that
is just.
TEX. R. APP. P. 5.
Accordingly, on August 13, 2014, this court ordered appellant to either (1) pay the
applicable filing fee or (2) provide written proof to this court that he is excused by statute or the
Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying the fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1 (providing that
indigent party who complies with provisions of that rule may proceed without advance payment
of costs). Our order informed appellant that if he failed to provide such written proof within the
time ordered, this appeal would be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Appellant has not
responded. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
The district clerk’s pending Notification of Late Record is, therefore, moot. Costs of appeal
are assessed against appellant.
PER CURIAM
-2-