Mitchell (William) v. State

An unpub|isl ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TI-IE STATE OF NEVADA WILLIAM H. MITCHELL_, No. 661'7 3 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, F § E*" E @ Respondent. SEp 03 2014 m 1_ o<. L\N:JEMAN cLER F rt coua'r av ‘ DEPUTY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of appellant’s "Motion to Transport." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; David B. Barker_, Judge. We lack jurisdiction because no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from such a decision. Ca,stillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Therefore, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. /~:a.»»»€m§@\ ,J. Hardesty Douglas Cherry d ccc Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge Carl E. G. Arnold Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk Williani H. Mitchell SuF'nEME Coun'r or NEvAoA .;»:»:1947,-\ _Zqj_/(p