NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE PACTIV LLC
______________________
2014-1066, -1067, -1068, -1069, -1070
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-
mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos.
90/011,132, 90/010,976, 90/011,128, 90/011,130, and
90/011,131.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
DANIEL H. SHULMAN, Reynolds Group Holdings, Ltd.,
of Lake Forest, Illinois, argued for appellant. With him on
the brief was JOHN C. GATZ, Nixon Peabody LLP, of Chi-
cago, Illinois.
AMY J. NELSON, Associate Solicitor, United States Pa-
tent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued
for appellee. With her on the brief were NATHAN K.
KELLEY, Solicitor, SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER, Senior Coun-
sel for Patent Law and Litigation, and ROBERT J.
MCMANUS, Associate Solicitor.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and
REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
September 15, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court