Here, the district court's June 13, 2013, order enforced the
portion of the amended divorce decree allowing respondent to exercise an
option to take possession of the marital residence if appellant failed to pay
for respondent's share within the specified time. An order enforcing a
prior order is not appealable as a special order after final judgment.
Gumm, 118 Nev. at 920, 59 P.3d at 1225. Moreover, to the extent the
district court denied appellant's countermotion to modify the divorce
decree, that countermotion was not based on a change in circumstances
because the asserted circumstances occurred prior to the entry of the
amended divorce decree and were raised in an identical motion filed before
the amended decree. Thus, appellant's challenge to respondent's
ownership of the marital residence, is simply an attack of the amended
divorce decree. Burton, 99 Nev. at 700, 669 P.2d at 705. Therefore, we
conclude that the district court's order is not appealable as a special order
after final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(8). Further, because the portion
of the district court's order awarding respondent attorney fees did not
establish an amount of fees, but directed respondent's counsel to file a
memorandum of fees and costs, the attorney fees award is not a final,
appealable award. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and
we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'
Aa_A
Hardesty
'In light of this order, we deny as moot appellant's motion for a stay.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947n cep,
cc: Hon. William B. Gonzalez, District Judge, Family Court Division
Robert E. Gaston, Settlement Judge
Cheri M. King
Radford J. Smith, Chtd.
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A ci(51049