Appellant did not attempt to demonstrate good cause to excuse
his delay. We therefore conclude that the district court did not err in
denying his petition as procedurally time barred, and we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2
J.
Hardesty
Douglas
tott%
, it
a)
Cherry
2 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in
proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude
that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent
that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those
submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings
below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's
request for the appointment of post-conviction counsel. See NRS 34.750.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) I94Th
cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge
Phillip Smith
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A e