determination on a habitual criminal allegation, see O'Neill v. State, 123
Nev. 9, 16, 153 P.3d 38, 43 (2007), and his sentence was within the
statutory range permitted by NRS 207.010(1)(b)(3). To the extent that
appellant raised claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, these claims
fell outside the narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to correct
an illegal sentence. See Edwards, 112 Nev. at 708, 918 P.2d at 324.
Therefore, without considering the merits of the claims that were outside
the scope permitted, we conclude that the district court did not err in
denying the motion. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AF'FIRMED. 2
j,
Hardesty
Douglas
ideri; J.
J.
2 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in
proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude
that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent
that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those
submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings
below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
RR 1947A e
cc: Hon. Robert W. Lane, District Judge
Gregory Allen Hatfield
Nye County District Attorney
Attorney General/Carson City
Nye County Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A e