STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
FILED
SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS September 18, 2014
RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK
SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
CHAD E. DANIELS, OF WEST VIRGINIA
Claimant Below, Petitioner
vs.) No. 13-0599 (BOR Appeal No. 2047927)
(Claim No. 2008011852)
ROCKHOUSE CREEK DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
Employer Below, Respondent
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Petitioner Chad E. Daniels, by John Blair, his attorney, appeals the decision of the West
Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. Rockhouse Creek Development, LLC, by
Steven Wellman, its attorney, filed a timely response.
This appeal arises from the Board of Review’s Final Order dated May 20, 2013, in which
the Board affirmed a November 19, 2012, Order of the Workers’ Compensation Office of
Judges. In its Order, the Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s January 13, 2011,
decision granting Mr. Daniels a 7% permanent partial disability award. The Court has carefully
reviewed the records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is
mature for consideration.
This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal
arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided
by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record
presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these
reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate
Procedure.
Mr. Daniels injured his lower back on September 5, 2007, while carrying fire
extinguishers. The claim was held compensable, and he received a 13% permanent partial
disability award for his compensable injury. Following the initial permanent partial disability
award, Brett Osborn, D.O., performed an L5-S1 laminectomy and discectomy, placed PEEK
cages at L5-S1, and placed pedicle screws at L5-S1 on January 26, 2010.
1
On November 2, 2010, Prasadarao Mukkamala, M.D., performed an independent medical
evaluation and after placing Mr. Daniels in lumbar category IV of West Virginia Code of State
Rules § 85-20-Table C (2006), found that Mr. Daniels sustained 20% whole person impairment
as a result of the September 5, 2007, injury. On January 13, 2011, the claims administrator
granted Mr. Daniels an additional 7% permanent partial disability award based on Dr.
Mukkamala’s independent medical evaluation.
Bruce Guberman, M.D., performed an independent medical evaluation on August 16,
2011. He determined that radiculopathy, muscle atrophy, and a loss of reflexes were present in
Mr. Daniels’s left lower extremity, and therefore placed him in lumbar category V of West
Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20-Table C. He then opined that Mr. Daniels sustained 25%
whole person impairment as a result of the September 5, 2007, injury. Paul Bachwitt, M.D.,
performed an independent medical evaluation on June 29, 2012. He placed Mr. Daniels in
lumbar category IV of West Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20-Table C and found that Mr.
Daniels sustained 20% whole person impairment as a result of the September 5, 2007, injury. He
opined that Dr. Guberman improperly placed Mr. Daniels in lumbar category V of West Virginia
Code of State Rules § 85-20-Table C, and stated that at the time of his examination there was no
evidence of radiculopathy or muscle atrophy.
In its Order affirming the January 13, 2011, claims administrator’s decision, the Office of
Judges held that the claims administrator properly granted Mr. Daniels a 7% permanent partial
disability award. Mr. Daniels disputes this finding and asserts that he is entitled to a 25%
permanent partial disability award for the injuries sustained on September 5, 2007, per the
opinion of Dr. Guberman.
The Office of Judges found that Dr. Guberman is the only physician of record to find
atrophy or loss of reflexes in the lower extremities, as well as the only physician to find evidence
of radiculopathy. The Office of Judges noted that the evidentiary record contains numerous
reports from Mr. Daniels’s treating physicians, including his surgeon, and found that none of
these reports indicate that muscle atrophy or reflex diminishment is present in the lower
extremities. The Office of Judges then found that Dr. Guberman’s placement of Mr. Daniels in
lumbar category V of West Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20-Table C is not well supported
by the evidence of record. Therefore, the Office of Judges found that Dr. Mukkamala’s and Dr.
Bachwitt’s reports placing Mr. Daniels in lumbar category IV of West Virginia Code of State
Rules § 85-20-Table C are more persuasive than the report of Dr. Guberman. The Board of
Review reached the same reasoned conclusions in its decision of May 20, 2013. We agree with
the reasoning and conclusions of the Board of Review.
For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the
evidentiary record. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.
2
Affirmed.
ISSUED: September 18, 2014
CONCURRED IN BY:
Chief Justice Robin J. Davis
Justice Brent D. Benjamin
Justice Margaret L. Workman
Justice Menis E. Ketchum
Justice Allen H. Loughry II
3