Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-14-00280-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF D.N.C., a Child
From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2013-PA-01461
Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 24, 2014
AFFIRMED
This is an appeal from the trial court’s termination of appellant’s parental rights. See TEX.
FAM. CODE ANN. § 161.001(1)(N), (O), (2) (West 2014). Appellant’s court-appointed attorney
filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes the appeal is without merit. The brief meets
the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-
CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders
procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights), disp. on merits, 2003 WL 22080522 (Tex.
App.—San Antonio Sept. 10, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.). Counsel provided appellant with a copy
of the brief. Appellant was informed of her right to review the record and advised of her right to
file a pro se brief. Appellate counsel provided appellant with a form motion for requesting the
04-14-00280-CV
record. The State waived its right to file an appellee’s brief unless appellant filed a pro se brief.
Appellant has not requested the record or filed a brief.
After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and
without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We GRANT counsel’s motion to
withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v.
State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
-2-