Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-14-00593-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF A.R.E., a Child
From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2013-PA-01424
Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 24, 2014
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental
rights. The trial court signed the order on July 3, 2014. Accordingly, appellant’s notice of appeal
was due to be filed on July 23, 2014. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b). A motion for extension of time to
file the notice of appeal was due on August 7, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Appellant filed a
notice of appeal on August 15, 2014.
A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good
faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace
period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner,
959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). But “once the period
04-14-00593-CV
for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer
invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction.” Id.
Because it did not appear to this court that we had jurisdiction to consider this appeal, we
ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction. Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a written response agreeing that this court
lacks appellate jurisdiction over the appeal. Because appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely
filed, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See id.
PER CURIAM
-2-
in the Interest of A.R.E., a Child
Combined Opinion