United States v. James Davis

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 30 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 13-50315 13-50316 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:04-cr-00770-RGK v. 2:04-cr-00771-RGK JAMES S. DAVIS, MEMORANDUM* Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 23, 2014** Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. In these consolidated appeals, James S. Davis appeals from the district court’s judgments revoking supervised release and the three-month, concurrent custodial sentences imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Davis’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Davis the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 2 13-50315 & 13-50316