FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 30 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 13-50315
13-50316
Plaintiff - Appellee,
D.C. Nos. 2:04-cr-00770-RGK
v. 2:04-cr-00771-RGK
JAMES S. DAVIS, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 23, 2014**
Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, James S. Davis appeals from the district
court’s judgments revoking supervised release and the three-month, concurrent
custodial sentences imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), Davis’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
provided Davis the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se
supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 13-50315 & 13-50316