State of New York
Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Third Judicial Department
Decided and Entered: October 2, 2014 517724
________________________________
In the Matter of MARK A.
SCARSELLI,
Petitioner,
v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
NEW YORK STATE AND LOCAL
POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT
SYSTEM et al.,
Respondents.
________________________________
Calendar Date: September 12, 2014
Before: Peters, P.J., Stein, Garry, Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ.
__________
Gleason, Dunn, Walsh & O'Shea, Albany (Brendan C. O'Shea of
counsel), for petitioner.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E.
Storrs of counsel), for respondents.
__________
Peters, P.J.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this
Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to
review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied
petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement
benefits.
Petitioner was an investigator with the New York State
Police Bureau of Criminal Investigation for approximately 17
years. On January 27, 2008, he injured his left ankle while
working at the police barracks in the Town of Ulster, Ulster
County. According to petitioner, as he entered the building, he
opened the door and failed to realize that his foot was on the
-2- 517724
edge of the sidewalk. The sidewalk was abutted by gravel that
was a few inches lower in depth. As petitioner moved around the
door while he was opening it, he inadvertently put too much
pressure on the outside of his left foot, which was on the edge
of the sidewalk, and it slipped off the sidewalk and onto the
gravel below, causing him to fall to the ground. Petitioner's
application for accidental disability retirement benefits in
connection with injuries he sustained as a result of this
incident was denied. Following a hearing, a Hearing Officer
concluded that the January 27, 2008 incident did not constitute
an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social
Security Law and recommended that the application be denied.
Respondent Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's
recommendation and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
It is well settled that an accident, for purposes of the
Retirement and Social Security Law, is an event that is "a
sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary,
and injurious in impact" (Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of
Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y.,
Art. II, 57 NY2d 1010, 1012 [1982] [internal quotation marks and
citation omitted]; see Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d
1336, 1337 [2013]). The burden rests upon the petitioner to
demonstrate that the event that precipitated his or her injury
constituted an accident (see Matter of Shea v DiNapoli, 115 AD3d
1023, 1024 [2014]; Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d at
1336). In order to qualify as such, the event must arise from a
risk that is not an inherent part of the petitioner's regular job
duties (see Matter of Roberts v DiNapoli, 117 AD3d 1166, 1166
[2014]; Matter of Amadio v McCall, 2 AD3d 1131, 1132 [2003]).
Furthermore, where the injury occurred as the result of a slip
and fall, the dispositive inquiry is "whether the condition that
caused the slip could have been 'reasonably anticipated'" (Matter
of Sammon v DiNapoli, 97 AD3d 952, 953 [2012], quoting Matter of
Murphy v New York State Comptroller, 92 AD3d 1022, 1023 [2012]).
Here, it is undisputed that petitioner was walking toward
the police barracks in the normal course of his duties at the
time of the incident in question. He testified that he had
worked at this location for a number of years and that, during
this time, he was unaware of any change in the sidewalk which was
-3- 517724
bordered by gravel. Significantly, no proof was presented that
the sidewalk was defective nor was there any indication that
petitioner's foot slipped off the sidewalk due to an unexpected
event. Accordingly, inasmuch as petitioner could have reasonably
anticipated the January 27, 2008 incident, substantial evidence
supports the Comptroller's decision denying him accidental
disability retirement benefits (see Matter of Cavallo v DiNapoli,
117 AD3d 1366, 1367 [2014]; Matter of Rodriquez v DiNapoli, 110
AD3d 1125, 1126-1127 [2013]; Matter of Piccinini v DiNapoli, 68
AD3d 1212, 1212-1213 [2009]; Matter of O'Brien v New York State
Comptroller, 56 AD3d 937, 938 [2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 708
[2009]).
Stein, Garry, Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without
costs, and petition dismissed.
ENTER:
Robert D. Mayberger
Clerk of the Court