United States v. Kejuan Moore

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 6 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-50338 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00215-DSF v. MEMORANDUM* KEJUAN CHAVIZ MOORE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 23, 2014** Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Kejuan Chaviz Moore appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the revocation of supervised release and the 10-day term of imprisonment and 54-month term of supervised release imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Moore’s counsel has filed a * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Moore the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 2 13-50338