Opinion issued October 7, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-14-00142-CV
———————————
KAREY B. STATIN, Appellant
V.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellee
On Appeal from the 190th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 2013-23471
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Karey Bernard Statin attempts to appeal an order granting a lien
foreclosure application filed by appellee pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure
736. On April 30, 2014, we sent appellant a notice of intent to dismiss this appeal
for want of jurisdiction because such orders are not reviewable by appeal. See TEX.
R. CIV. P. 736.8(c) (order granting or denying foreclosure application under Texas
Rule of Civil Procedure 736 “is not subject to a motion for rehearing, new trial, bill
of review, or appeal.”). We informed appellant that the appeal would be dismissed
for want of jurisdiction unless he filed a response demonstrating that this Court has
jurisdiction over this appeal Appellant failed to file an adequate response.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. CIV.
P. 736.8(c); Thweatt v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., No. 01–14–00261–CV,
2014 WL 2538691, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] June 5, 2014, no pet.)
(dismissing appeal of Rule 736 order for lack of jurisdiction); Johnson v.
Residential Funding Real Estate Holdings, LLC, No. 01–10–00287–CV, 2011 WL
2418516, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] May 26, 2011, no pet.) (same).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp.
2