Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-14-00135-CR
Zidney Kirk ZUNIGA,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 112th Judicial District Court, Sutton County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2180
Honorable Pedro Gomez, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 8, 2014
MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED
Zidney Kirk Zuniga pled guilty to credit or debit card abuse as part of a plea agreement
with the State. Pursuant to the agreement, the trial court found Zuniga guilty and placed him on
community supervision for a period of four years. The State later filed a motion to revoke Zuniga’s
community supervision, alleging he violated various conditions of his community supervision.
Zuniga pled true to all the allegations. After a hearing, the trial court revoked Zuniga’s community
supervision, and imposed sentence. Zuniga timely appealed.
04-14-00135-CR
Zuniga’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in which
he concludes this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), and
Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Counsel sent copies of the brief and
motion to withdraw to Zuniga, and Zuniga was informed of his rights to review the appellate record
and file a pro se brief. On May 29, 2014, we issued an order advising Zuniga that his pro se brief
was due July 14. On July 2, 2014, we issued a further order advising Zuniga how to contact this
court if he desired access to the appellate record. The July 2, 2014 order was returned as
undeliverable. This court knows of no other address at which appellant can be contacted. Zuniga
did not file a pro se brief.
After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we find no reversible error and agree with
counsel the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2005). We therefore grant the motion to withdraw filed by Zuniga’s counsel and affirm the
trial court’s judgment. See id.; Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997,
no pet.).
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-