United States v. Arnulfo Gomez-Vargas

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 21 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-10651 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:13-cr-00778-RCC v. MEMORANDUM* ARNULFO GOMEZ-VARGAS, a.k.a. Arnulfo Vargas Gomez, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 14, 2014** Before: LEAVY, GOULD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges. Arnulfo Gomez-Vargas appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 52-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S. 738 (1967), Gomez-Vargas’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Gomez-Vargas the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Gomez-Vargas has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED. 2 13-10651