UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7203
ROBERT W. DOUGHERTY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF, FAIRFAX
COUNTY, VIRGINIA; SHERIFF STAN BARRY, Fairfax County Adult
Detention Center, Fairfax VA; LIEUTENANT MICHAEL CHAPMAN,
Fairfax County Adult Detention Center, Fairfax VA;
LIEUTENANT PATTY CHARTAK, Fairfax County Adult Detention
Center, Fairfax VA; DEPUTY HARRY JOHNSON, Fairfax County
Adult Detention Center, Fairfax VA; WARDEN CARL A. MANIS,
Green Rock Correctional Center, Chatham VA; CAPTAIN D. W.
HAMILTON, Green Rock Correctional Center, Chatham VA;
COUNSELOR C. M. COATES; COUNSELOR R. E. HATCH, Green Rock
Correctional Center, Chatham VA; SERGEANT MORTON, Green Rock
Correctional Center, Chatham VA; CORPORAL LOWE, Green Rock
Correctional Center, Chatham VA; O.S.S. RUNYON, Law
Librarian, Green Rock Correctional Center, Chatham VA;
WARDEN SAMUEL V. PRUETT, Coffeewood Correctional Center,
Mitchells VA; UNIT MANAGER MARCADO, Coffeewood Correctional
Center, Mitchells VA; COUNSELOR J. AMISON, Coffeewood
Correctional Center, Mitchells VA; CORPORAL WILLIAMSON,
Coffeewood Correctional Center, Mitchells VA; HEARING
OFFICER S. WILLIAMS, Coffeewood Correctional Center,
Mitchells VA; DOUGLAS GOURDINE, Institutional Programs
Manager, Coffeewood Correctional Center, Mitchells VA;
O.S.A. KITTS, Law Librarian, Coffeewood Correctional Center,
Mitchells VA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:14-cv-00066-GEC-RSB)
Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 24, 2014
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert W. Dougherty, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert W. Dougherty appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint. ∗ We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Dougherty v. Commonwealth of Va., No. 7:14-cv-
00066-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. July 17, 2014). We deny Dougherty’s
motion to compel production of documents. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗
We conclude that the order is final and appealable as no
amendment to the complaint could cure the defects identified by
the district court. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers
Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066–67 (4th Cir. 1993).
3