Com. v. Hagner, D.

J-S64036-14 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. DONALD HAGNER Appellant No. 1132 WDA 2014 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence June 27, 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-26-CR-0002011-2013 BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., BENDER, P.J.E., and LAZARUS, J. MEMORANDUM BY GANTMAN, P.J.: FILED OCTOBER 24, 2014 Appellant, Donald Hagner, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered in the Fayette County Court of Common Pleas, following his guilty plea to four (4) counts of aggravated indecent assault and one (1) count of corruption of minors.1 We affirm. In its opinion, the trial court fully sets forth the relevant facts and procedural history of this case. Therefore, we have no reason to restate them. Appellant raises two issues for our review: IS IT UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO REQUIRE…APPELLANT TO REGISTER FOR A LIFETIME WHEN SAID REGISTRATION ____________________________________________ 1 18 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 3125(a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(7), (a)(8), and 6301(a)(1), respectively. J-S64036-14 REQUIREMENT EXCEEDS THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM PENALTY FOR APPELLANT’S OFFENSE? IS THE ADAM WALSH STATUTE UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN REQUIRING…APPELLANT TO REGISTER FOR A LIFETIME? (Appellant’s Brief at 7). Pennsylvania law states that registration requirements under the Sexual Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9799.10-9799.41, do not constitute criminal punishment. Commonwealth v. McDonough, 96 A.3d 1067 (Pa.Super. 2014). In McDonough, this Court rejected the argument that mandating compliance with SORNA by offenders, who have served their maximum term, is unconstitutional. Id. After a thorough review of the record, the briefs of the parties, the applicable law, and the well-reasoned opinion of the Honorable Gerald R. Solomon, we conclude Appellant’s issues merit no relief. The trial court opinion discusses and properly disposes of the questions presented. (See Trial Court Opinion, filed July 28, 2014, at 2-4) (finding: registration requirements imposed by SORNA are remedial, not punitive; registration is properly characterized as collateral consequence of defendant’s plea; application of registration requirements is not limited by factors which control imposition of sentence; offender who has served maximum term can still be required to comply with SORNA registration requirements; thus, application of lifetime registration under SORNA to Appellant is not -2- J-S64036-14 unconstitutional). Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of the trial court opinion. Judgment of sentence affirmed. Judgment Entered. Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary Date: 10/24/2014 -3- Circulated 10/14/2014 03:38 PM Circulated 10/14/2014 03:38 PM Circulated 10/14/2014 03:38 PM Circulated 10/14/2014 03:38 PM