association may nonjudicially foreclose on that lien. The district court's
decisions thus were based on an erroneous interpretation of the controlling
law and did not reach the other issues colorably asserted. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND
REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with
this order.
Pit J.
Pickeri
L-0
, J.
Saitta
PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring:
For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
U.S. Bank, NA., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners
association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR
Investments is now the4 controlling law and, thusly, concur in the
disposition of this appeal.
— rek..flOtt.-06 -1--
Parraguirre
cc: Hon. Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, District Judge
Howard Kim & Associates
Ballard Spahr, LLP
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA 2
(0) 1947A afao,