State of New York
Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Third Judicial Department
Decided and Entered: November 6, 2014 518718
________________________________
In the Matter of ROBERTA B.
KATZ,
Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
COMMISSIONER OF LABOR,
Respondent.
________________________________
Calendar Date: September 16, 2014
Before: Peters, P.J., Stein, Garry, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ.
__________
Abraham J. Katz, Lake Success, for appellant.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City
(Marjorie S. Leff of counsel), for respondent.
__________
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal
Board, filed July 12, 2013, which ruled that claimant was
disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits
because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
On December 3, 2012, claimant began working for an
organization that provides vocational services for persons with
disabilities. Her hours were Monday through Friday from 9:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and she was being trained to take the position
of director of accounting. Prior to accepting the job, she
received the employer's assurance that her religious practices
would be accommodated. In accordance therewith, she wanted to
leave work at 2:45 p.m. on Friday, December 7, 2012 to observe
the Jewish Sabbath. Her trainer scheduled a meeting on that date
from 2:00 p.m. until 3:00 p.m., but told claimant that she could
leave at 2:45 p.m. At 2:40 p.m., however, the trainer told
claimant that she needed her to prepare a computer-generated
-2- 518718
report. When claimant responded that she could not complete it
within five minutes, the trainer agreed to prepare it herself but
then asked claimant to log on to her computer to get a password
the trainer needed to do the report. At 2:50 p.m., after
observing that claimant was upset and anxious to get home, she
told claimant to leave. Claimant did not report to work the
following Monday, but resigned from her position due to what she
perceived was religious harassment. She applied for unemployment
insurance benefits and the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board
ultimately ruled that she was disqualified from receiving them
because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Claimant now appeals.
We affirm. Regardless of the inappropriateness of the
trainer's actions, claimant resigned from her position without
affording the employer an opportunity to investigate the matter
or take corrective action. Indeed, she emailed the employer
announcing her resignation the Sunday after the incident and
before she even discussed it with the employer's human resources
manager. Under these circumstances, substantial evidence
supports the Board's finding that claimant voluntarily left her
employment without good cause (see Matter of Schwartz [New York
City Dept. of Citywide Admin. Servs.–Commissioner of Labor], 62
AD3d 1231, 1232 [2009]; Matter of Roman [Commissioner of Labor],
32 AD3d 1067, 1068 [2006]). We have considered claimant's
remaining arguments and find them to be unpersuasive. Therefore,
we decline to disturb the Board's decision.
Peters, P.J., Stein, Garry, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ.,
concur.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
ENTER:
Robert D. Mayberger
Clerk of the Court