State v. Porras

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. NO. 33,600 5 DANIEL LEAL PORRAS 6 Defendant-Appellant. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY 8 Charles Cruse Currier, District Judge 9 Gary K. King, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM 11 for Appellee 12 Jesse R. Cosby 13 Roswell, NM 14 for Appellant 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 HANISEE, Judge. 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 3 been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. 4 {2} AFFIRMED. 5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 ____________________________________ 7 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 ___________________________________ 10 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 11 ___________________________________ 12 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 2