=================================================================
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
publication in the New York Reports.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
No. 194
The People &c.,
Respondent,
v.
Derrick Hill,
Appellant.
Jonathan Garelick, for appellant.
Philip Morrow, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed
and a new trial ordered.
Absent "unusual circumstances," evidence of a
defendant's silence at the time of arrest is generally
- 1 -
- 2 - No. 194
inadmissible under common-law evidentiary principles (People v
Conyers, 52 NY2d 454, 459 [1981]). And the use for impeachment
purposes of a defendant's silence after receiving Miranda
warnings has been deemed impermissible as a matter of due process
(see Doyle v Ohio, 426 US 610, 619 [1976]). Under the
circumstances presented, we conclude that defendant did not open
the door to evidence of his post-Miranda silence and, therefore,
Supreme Court erred in permitting its introduction at trial. Nor
can the error be viewed as harmless in this case.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Order reversed and a new trial ordered, in a memorandum. Chief
Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Rivera
concur. Judge Abdus-Salaam took no part.
Decided November 18, 2014
- 2 -