Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 671
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION II
No. CR-11-415
Opinion Delivered November 19, 2014
EDWARD ANTHONY LIGGINS APPEAL FROM THE CRAIGHEAD
APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,
WESTERN DISTRICT
V. [NO. CR-09-1147]
STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE CINDY THYER,
APPELLEE JUDGE
REBRIEFING ORDERED; TERESA
BLOODMAN RELIEVED AS
COUNSEL; ROBBY GOLDEN
APPOINTED TO REPRESENT
APPELLANT
WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge
A Craighead County jury found appellant Edward Anthony Liggins guilty of first-
degree murder and first-degree battery. He was sentenced to forty years’ imprisonment for
first-degree murder; however, his sentence was enhanced by fifteen years and ten years,
respectively, for employing a firearm and for committing the crime in the presence of a child.1
The sentence plus the enhancements were to run consecutively, for an aggregate sentence of
sixty-five years’ imprisonment. He was sentenced to twenty-years’ imprisonment for first-
1
Ark. Code Ann. § 16-90-120 and Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-702 (Supp. 2013).
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 671
degree battery. This sentence was to run concurrently to the sixty-five-year sentence.2
Liggins subsequently filed a motion for a new trial. His motion was denied. He timely filed
his notice of appeal.
Liggins argues on appeal that (1) the trial court erred by not ordering a mistrial when,
during the penalty phase, a victim-impact witness improperly recommended to the jury that
he receive a sentence of life without parole; (2) the trial court abused its discretion by not
correcting the actions of trial counsel and the prosecutor when they read jury instructions
during voir dire; (3) Liggins was denied counsel of his choice when the trial court refused to
grant a continuance to allow Liggins’s appellate counsel the opportunity to enter her
appearance and prepare for trial; (4) the trial court committed reversible error when it insisted
that Liggins continue to be represented by his trial counsel after Liggins clearly and
unequivocally asserted his constitutional right to represent himself, thereby denying him his
right to self-representation; (5) the trial court abused its discretion by denying Liggins’s
motion for new trial because his trial counsel’s performance was deficient in that he abdicated
his duty as counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment; (6) the trial court erred in denying
Liggins’s motion for directed verdict, because there was insufficient evidence to support his
first-degree-murder conviction; (7) the trial court erred by imposing an illegal sentence when
it did not sentence Liggins in accordance with Ark. Code Ann. §§ 5-1-103(a)3 and 5-4-
2
His probation on an underlying offense was also revoked and he was sentenced to
thirty-years’ imprisonment to run concurrently to the above convictions. However, the
revocation is not an issue in this appeal.
3
(Repl. 2006).
2
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 671
104(a)4; (8) the trial court erred in denying Liggins’s motion to suppress statements made
while he was in police custody; and (9) the trial court erred by imposing an illegal sentence
when it ran the forty-year jury verdict, the fifteen-year firearm enhancement, and the ten-year
enhancement for committing a felony in the presence of a child consecutively. We do not
reach the merits of Liggins’s arguments due to deficiencies in his abstract, addendum, and
brief.5 We must again order rebriefing.
We do not know why Ms. Bloodman has persistently failed to comply with Arkansas
Supreme Court Rule 4-2 and prior orders in this case.6 Justice requires that we relieve Ms.
Bloodman as appellant’s counsel. We appoint Robby Golden to represent Liggins in this
appeal.
Rebriefing ordered; Teresa Bloodman relieved as counsel; Robby Golden appointed
to represent appellant.
WYNNE and GRUBER, JJ., agree.
Teresa Bloodman, for appellant.
Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Nicana C. Sherman, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
4
(Supp. 2013).
5
This is the third time this case has been before us. We have twice ordered rebriefing
due to deficiencies in Liggins’s brief and addendum. Liggins v. State, 2012 Ark. App. 555;
Liggins v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 181.
6
Bloodman received three extensions before resubmitting this last appeal, yet the brief
she filed is still noncompliant.
3