Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J), dated April 3, 2013, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In determining a defendant’s risk level pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C), the People have the burden of establishing the facts supporting the determination sought by clear and convincing evidence (see Cor *819 rection Law § 168-n [3]; People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 571 [2009]; People v King, 80 AD3d 681, 682 [2011]).
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the factors relied upon by the People to determine his classification as a level two sex offender were established by clear and convincing evidence (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 571-572 [2009]; People v Johnson, 85 AD3d 889 [2011]; People v Fortin, 29 AD3d 765, 766 [2006]; People v Mitchell, 300 AD2d 377, 378 [2002]).