=================================================================
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
publication in the New York Reports.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
No. 232 SSM 22
The People &c.,
Respondent,
v.
Tyrone Davis,
Appellant.
Submitted by Steven A. Feldman, for appellant.
Submitted by Thomas Constant, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant failed to bring a motion to withdraw his plea
under CPL 220.60 (3) or a motion to vacate the judgment of
conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10. Nor did his factual
recitation negate the intent element of the crime to which he
- 1 -
- 2 - SSM No. 22
pleaded guilty. His plea therefore does not qualify for the
"rare case" exception to the preservation requirement under
People v Lopez (71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]). Consequently,
defendant's challenge to the factual sufficiency of his
allocution "was properly rejected by the Appellate Division and
its order upholding the plea and conviction should be affirmed"
(People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726 [1995]).
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules,
order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges
Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided November 20, 2014
- 2 -
The People v. Tyrone Davis
Combined Opinion