UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7150
LEO MCCLAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JANICE THOMAS, RN; DR. REDDY; DR. MCDONALD; DISHA DAVE,
Social Worker; DR. JOSE CHAVEZ; DR. CRISPLAND GRINN; MR.
JAMES, MHS; KIA WILSON; CARLA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (3:13-cv-01682-TLW)
Submitted: November 18, 2014 Decided: November 21, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leo McClam, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Leo McClam appeals the district court’s order adopting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and
amended complaints. This court may exercise jurisdiction only
over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Because McClam may proceed with
his claims by filing another complaint and providing factual
allegations specifying how the named defendants violated his
constitutional rights, the order he seeks to appeal is neither a
final order with respect to those claims nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v.
Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.
1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2