UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7260
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM SHAW, Judge/Try Cases; KEVIN P. SHA, Lawyer/Suppose
to Defend Accusers; CARTER PHILLIPS, Lawyer/Suppose to
Defend,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:14-cv-00426-HEH-MHL)
Submitted: November 18, 2014 Decided: November 21, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth H. Newkirk, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth H. Newkirk appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint with prejudice
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)
(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Newkirk v. Shaw, No. 3:14-cv-00426-HEH-MHL
(E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2