FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 24 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JORGE GUADALUPE MORENO No. 13-72764
RAMIREZ, AKA Jorge Guadalupe
Moreno, AKA Beto Moreno, AKA Jorge Agency No. A035-834-241
Moreno, AKA Jorge Moreno Ramirez,
Petitioner, MEMORANDUM*
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 18, 2014**
Before: LEAVY, FISHER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Jorge Guadalupe Moreno Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his
appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against
Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for
substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d
1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for
review, and we remand.
Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief because
Moreno Ramirez failed to establish that it is more likely than not that he will be
tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the Mexican government. See
Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir. 2008).
In denying Moreno Ramirez’s asylum and withholding of removal claims,
the agency found he failed to establish past persecution or a fear of future
persecution on account of a protected ground. The BIA did not consider the
impact, if any, of this court’s recent decision in Henriquez-Rivas v. Holder, 707
F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2013) (en banc). Further, when the IJ and BIA issued its
decisions, they did not have the benefit of this court’s decisions in Cordoba v.
Holder, 726 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2013), and Pirir-Boc v. Holder, 750 F.3d 1077
(9th Cir. 2014), or the BIA’s decisions in Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 227
(BIA 2014), and Matter of W-G-R-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 208 (BIA 2014). Thus, we
remand Moreno Ramirez’s asylum and withholding of removal claims to determine
2 13-72764
the impact, if any, of these decisions. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18
(2002) (per curiam).
Each party shall bear its own costs for this petition for review.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part;
REMANDED.
3 13-72764