the pleadings, AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further
proceedings consistent with this order.
steo-4; ,J.
Hardesty
J.
Douglas
CHERRY, J., concurring
For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool I, LLC v.
U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
that respondent Bank of America lost its lien priority by virtue of the
homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize,
however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly,
concur in the disposition of this appeal.
Ck J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge
Kang & Associates PLLC
Akerman LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A Wel(M.