dismiss, AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further
proceedings consistent with this order.
, J.
J.
Douglas
CHERRY, J., concurring:
For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners
association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR
Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the
disposition of this appeal.
Cktut J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge
The Dean Legal Group, Ltd.
Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A