NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE RICHARD A. GRAFF
______________________
2014-1288
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No.
10/885,569.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MICHAEL K. MUTTER, Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch,
of Falls Church, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him
on the brief was D. RICHARD ANDERSON. Of counsel on the
brief was PETER K. TRYNA, Peter K. Trzyna Law Office
P.C., of Chicago, Illinois.
JOSEPH MATEL, Associate Solicitor, United States Pa-
tent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia,
argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN
K. KELLEY, Solicitor, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Deputy Solici-
tor, and AMY J. NELSON, Associate Solicitor.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and O’MALLEY, Cir-
cuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 8, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court