Carlos Alberto Bustos v. State

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 9, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00871-CR CARLOS ALBERTO BUSTOS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 339th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1350260 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant has been charged with aggravated sexual assault. Appellant’s pre- trial bond was revoked by written order signed November 5, 2013. On September 9, 2014, appellant filed a motion requesting that the trial court reduce the new $100,000 bond and reinstate his original bail amount or set a reasonable bail. The trial court denied the motion by a written order signed October 7, 2014. On October 20, 2014, appellant filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record was filed December 3, 2014. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals recently held that appellate courts lack jurisdiction to review an interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion for pretrial bail reduction. See Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (holding that there is no constitutional or statutory authority granting the courts of appeals jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals regarding excessive bail or the denial of bail). The Ragston court made it clear that Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 31, which provides the procedures for appeals in habeas corpus and bail proceedings, does not grant a right of interlocutory appeal from an order denying a pretrial motion for bond reduction. Id. Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Busby, and Brown. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2