Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Nos. 04-14-00725-CR & 04-14-00726-CR
Joe Eric HINOJOSA,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of TexasAppellee
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court Nos. 2013CR10041 & 2013CR10042
Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 10, 2014
DISMISSED
The trial court’s certification in each of these appeals states that “this criminal case is a
plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record for each appeal
contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment
recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s
certification accurately reflects that the underlying cases are plea-bargain cases. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 25.2(a)(2).
04-14-00725-CR & 04-14-00726-CR
Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be
dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part
of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). On October 29, 2014, we ordered that
these appeals would be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court
certification showing that the appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate
records by November 24, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154
S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio
2003, no pet.). No response was filed. In the absence of an amended trial court certification
showing that the appellant has the right of appeal, rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss these
appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-