Order entered December 9, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-00490-CR
No. 05-14-00491-CR
No. 05-14-00492-CR
No. 05-14-00493-CR
JIMIL BROWN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-33944-M, F10-33945-M, F12-33914-M, F12-34048-M
ORDER
Counsel filed an Anders brief in these cases. The appeals are from appellant’s conviction
following the adjudication of his guilt. Although counsel mentions the original plea proceedings,
he does not discuss the March 26, 2012 or the September 12, 2012 hearings. Nor does the brief
address the validity of the indictment, the admonishments, or any motions that may have been
filed. Moreover, the record reflects that the conditions of appellant’s community supervision
were modified, but counsel does not discuss the proceedings, if any, at which the modifications
were made. Finally, counsel does not address any motions that were filed by appellant.
Accordingly, we conclude the brief does not satisfy the requirements of Anders and its progeny.
See Jeffery v. State, 903 S.W.2d 776 (Tex. App.––Dallas 1995, no pet.). Accordingly, we
STRIKE the Anders brief filed by counsel on December 5, 2014.
We ORDER counsel to file, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, either an
amended brief that complies with the requirements of Anders and its progeny or a brief raising
issues on the merits.
/s/ LANA MYERS
JUSTICE
Jimil Brown v. State
Combined Opinion