REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND
REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings
consistent with this order.
J.
Hardesty
CHERRY, J., concurring:
For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
that the holder of the first security interest lost its lien priority by virtue
of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize,
however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly,
concur in the disposition of this appeal.
Iny J.
cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge
Maier Gutierrez Ayon, PLLC
Akerman LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A e