United States v. Private E2 TONY M. MAY

UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Before JOHNSON, BAIME, and BURTON Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Private E2 TONY M. MAY United States Army, Appellant ARMY 20090033 Headquarters, 10th Mountain Division (LI) & Fort Drum Andrew Glass and Michael J. Hargis, Military Judges Lieutenant Colonel Steven P. Hester, Staff Judge Advocate (pretrial) Lieutenant Colonel Michael O. Lacey, Staff Judge Advocate (post-trial) For Appellant: Colonel Mark Tellitocci, JA; Lieutenant Colonel Matthew M. Miller, JA; Major Timothy W. Thomas, JA; Captain A. Jason Nef, JA (on brief). For Appellee: Colonel Michael Mulligan, JA; Major Christopher B. Burgess, JA; Major Sara M. Root, JA. (on brief). 26 October 2010 --------------------------------- SUMMARY DISPOSITION -------------------------------- Per Curiam: An enlisted panel sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of disobeying a superior commissioned officer, two specifications of violating a lawful regulation, maltreatment, two specifications of making a false official statement, three specifications of assault, burglary, drunk and disorderly conduct, and obstructing justice, in violation of Articles 90, 92, 93, 107, 128, 129, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 890, 892, 893, 907, 928, 929, and 934. The appellant was sentenced to reduction to the grade of Private E1, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, thirty-six months confinement, and a dishonorable discharge. The convening authority approved confinement for thirty-five months and the remainder of the adjudged sentence. This case is before us for review pursuant to Article 66, UCMJ. On appeal, appellant alleges the government’s dilatory post-trial processing warrants post-trial sentencing relief. We disagree and order no relief. However, although not raised by appellant, we cannot affirm the two false official statement specifications in their entirety. Both specifications allege appellant made statements, which were “totally false.” The evidence does not support findings of guilty to these specifications. Rather, each statement only contains certain particularized false official statements. Thus, we will amend these two specifications in our decretal paragraph. DECISION We affirm only so much of Specification 1 of Charge III as finds appellant “Did, at or near Fort Drum, New York, on or about 26 June 2008,[1] with intent to deceive, sign an official statement to wit: a DA Form 2823 Sworn Statement, which statement was false in that appellant stated “that is when anderson made a comment about my girlfriends butt and i snapped. i snagged him up by the neck in a choke, then i threw him to the ground. while on the ground he still wanted to talk about her so i hit him four or five times closed fisted” [sic], he “ran out of the room. out in to the parking lot where stacy and sgt. lee were waiting” [sic], he was not drinking at SSG Lee’s residence, “I did not see anyone else drinking,” and SSG Lee did not go into Private Anderson’s barracks room with him, or words to that effect, and was then known by the said Private (E-2) Tony M. May to be so false.” We affirm only so much of Specification 2 of Charge III as finds appellant “Did, at or near Fort Drum, New York, on or about 14 July 2008, with intent to deceive, sign an official statement, to wit: a DA Form 2823 Sworn Statement, which statement was false in that appellant stated that Private Anderson’s head hit his elbow or words to that effect, and was then known by the said Private (E-2) Tony M. May to be so false.” The remaining charges and specifications are affirmed. We have considered the matters personally asserted by appellant pursuant to United States v. Grostefon¸12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), and find them to be without merit. The sentence is affirmed. FOR THE COURT: MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR. Clerk of Court ----------------------- [1] We note the statement was actually signed on 25 June 2008, which is on or about 26 June 2008.