Reeves v. Bally's Grand Hotel & Casino

For appellant to reopen her claim, she must show that there has been a change of circumstances warranting an increase or rearrangement of compensation and that the primary cause of the change in circumstances is the original industrial injury. NRS 616C.390(1). The only medical reporting in the record that was issued after appellant's claim was closed are the 2010 reports from Drs. Curtis Poindexter and Satish Sharma. While both physicians acknowledged that appellant still suffers from physical problems, neither physician opined that appellant's condition had changed so as to warrant additional benefits or that any change was primarily caused by appellant's original industrial injury. Dr. Poindexter's 2011 report clearly states his opinion that based on appellant's x-rays and MRI, he did not find that appellant's condition had progressively worsened and that any progression of her condition is likely due to aging. Dr. Sharma's reports do not address any change in appellant's condition. Thus, substantial evidence in the record supports the appeals officer's determination that appellant had not submitted sufficient evidence showing a change in condition so as to warrant claim reopening under the statutory standard. See NRS 616C.390(1) (providing the requirements for claim reopening); Vredenburg v. Sedgwick CMS, 124 Nev. 553, 557 & n.4, 188 P.3d 1084, 1087-88 & n.4 (2008) (defining substantial evidence); Wright v. State, Dep't of Motor Vehicles, 121 Nev. 122, 125, 110 P.3d 1066, 1068 (2005) (recognizing that substantial evidence may be inferred from the lack of evidence). Accordingly, because the appeals officer did not err or abuse her discretion in denying reopening of appellant's claim, we affirm the district court's order denying judicial review. See Vredenburg, 124 Nev. at SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A e 557, 188 P.3d at 1087-88 (explaining that this court will not disturb the appeals officer's factual findings on judicial review if they are supported by substantial evidence). It is so ORDERED. 4:20—k reP-4 t Parraguirre ' J. Douglas Chu. Cherry cc: Hon. Kenneth C. Cory, District Judge Susan Reeves Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COUFtT OF NEVADA 3 (0) I947A